From: Diane Trout <diane@caltech.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:57:41 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: IPAR detection is more reliable than firecrest so do it first, and then
X-Git-Tag: 0.2.0.3~7
X-Git-Url: http://woldlab.caltech.edu/gitweb/?p=htsworkflow.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=a66c328cada96d5afd9745c9f1fcce31f9c51799

IPAR detection is more reliable than firecrest so do it first, and then
check for firecrest second
---

diff --git a/htsworkflow/pipelines/runfolder.py b/htsworkflow/pipelines/runfolder.py
index 6b953ce..5d663b3 100644
--- a/htsworkflow/pipelines/runfolder.py
+++ b/htsworkflow/pipelines/runfolder.py
@@ -239,9 +239,9 @@ def get_specific_run(gerald_dir):
     logging.debug('gerald_dir: %s' % (gerald_dir,))
 
     # find our processed image dir
-    image_run = firecrest.firecrest(image_dir)
+    image_run = ipar.ipar(image_dir)
     if image_run is None:
-        image_run = ipar.ipar(image_dir)
+        image_run = firecrest.firecrest(image_dir)
     if image_run is None:
         msg = '%s does not contain an image processing step' % (image_dir,)
         logging.error(msg)