<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="pyblosxom/1.3.2 2/13/2006" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>Diane's World 27 Apr 2006</title>
<link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi</link>
<description>I take the 5th</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
  <title>Special TAC meeting</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac/2006-04-27-16-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>covering the 3 things that changed since their last meeting</li>
</ul>
<p>Whats &quot;sequa&quot;</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>there's already some conditioning of a project build, how does this
fee extend things.<ul>
<li>How are the funds going to be spent?</li>
<li>Does it help with streamling other aspects of the project</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The fee goes away when the projects finish</li>
<li>The fee is attached to building those $54e6 of projects.</li>
<li>they want some more detail about how it'll help, save some of the discussion.</li>
<li>doesn't it set a bound on how far the the developers study has to extend.</li>
<li>they want a industry specific FAQ</li>
<li>is there a way of more specifically planning out what improvents are needed
so the developers can have less uncertainty about a council or developer
suddenly want something new.</li>
<li>Arts busses need to be frequent reliable convient</li>
<li>Would it be possible to opt in?</li>
<li>May 5th tac meeting 7.30 am</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
