<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="pyblosxom/1.3.2 2/13/2006" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>Diane's World 09 Feb 2006</title>
<link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi</link>
<description>I take the 5th</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
  <title>TAC Meeting</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac/2006-02-09-20-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>adjustments to to the agenda<ul>
<li>note that they only did the automobile counts?</li>
<li>the comment about &quot;report card&quot; measurements</li>
<li>fuller EIR,</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Los Angeles Times<ul>
<li>changes in suburban development, complimentary to pasadena</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Floraline Stevenes, PhD, Educator, new comissioner</li>
<li>Roger suggests that the commussion form a working group, on bike parking.
Gray, DelGado, Valesques<ul>
<li>Zoning code is online</li>
<li>Urban land institute, shared parking analysis, residental parking
for apartments &amp; condos, 1.5, 1.7 dwelling units</li>
<li>Survey of 4000 urban california parking 1.59 parking spaces per unit.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Trip reduction ordance<ul>
<li>is there data available of how many properties meet these various
thresholds</li>
<li>They need to determine the remaining fee structure</li>
<li>talk to city attorney</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Westgate Draft EIR<ul>
<li>Apeals, 10 days after action item</li>
<li>Last day pubic coment feb 21st</li>
<li>Public comments<ul>
<li>West pasadena resident association</li>
<li>has many issues with EIR</li>
<li>substitution of max for minimum for</li>
<li>changed intersection policy from D to E
(long lines, waiting through several cycles)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>there's a computer model of the traffic plan
Wonder if one can get it?</li>
<li>Comissioner comments<ul>
<li>Roger points out the lack of pedestrian data</li>
<li>comissioner delgado , why aren't there more counts<ul>
<li>2015, allows minimum requirement traffic E</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>next comissioner<ul>
<li>why isn't there more commercial</li>
<li>10' setback from street isn't walkable</li>
<li>several intersections drop to E or worse,
is that to encourage mass transit by preventing anything else
from working</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Planning commission<ul>
<li>Feb 22</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
