<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="pyblosxom/1.3.2 2/13/2006" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>Diane's World   </title>
<link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi</link>
<description>I take the 5th</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
  <title>TAC 2006 11 02</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac-2006-11-02-21-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<ul class="simple">
<li>comments</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>old business<ul>
<li>gold line queueing<ul>
<li>korve engineeering</li>
<li>MTA present
* engineer from kentucky here
* &quot;reduced&quot; 20-30 sec
* trains gold line 190 weekday 164 weekend<ul>
<li>72 sec preemtion</li>
<li>20 sec mandatory wait</li>
<li>electric train, doesn't have motion activated sensors?
theyre fixed?</li>
<li>crossing appropach triggers activation process</li>
<li>to minimzie down times
* first did the express service
* change control system, allow higher speed
* this allowed them to</li>
<li>40 minutes down time... during track maintenance</li>
<li>broken down train, led to 5 minute down time</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>public comments<ul>
<li>neil climan, resident association...<ul>
<li>madison heights residents inconvenced.<ul>
<li>queue lengs up to 600 ft, promised 40 -60 ft</li>
<li>streets are &gt;85% of capacity, which means any error causes
system to break.</li>
<li>Improvements to one direction hurts the other?</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Professor Zimmer, CalPoly Pomona, Planner<ul>
<li>Capstone, Studio class</li>
<li>Students present scope of work</li>
<li>results next march will be the students work</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Environmental Capacity Meeting</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac-environmentcapcity-2006-10-26-10-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">History</p>
<p>General Plan, Hisotry,
Appleyard, Liveable Streets, 1981
www.trafficcalming.org
neighborhood transportation managemant plan</p>
<p>new zeland and australia have done some work trying to
define environmental capacity.</p>
<p>final deliverable an amend/supplement NTMP to define EC</p>
<p>EC review would be trigered by NTMP, possibly...</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Plan</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Literature Review, understand</li>
<li>Understand current NTMP process</li>
<li>Formulate Extensions</li>
<li>Street Classification<ul>
<li>Minor, Major Arterieral, neighborhood street</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Done by, May</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Street classification,</p>
<p>Deemphasized streets, what is</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Todo,</p>
<p>Read packet,
Mobility Transportation Plan</p>
<p>FHWA federal highway admistration map</p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <title>TAC Meeting 2006 Oct 6</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac-2006-10-06-10-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">Public comments</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Resident from south pas argued against the 710 tunnel.
Oct 12</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Aproval of minutes</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">council comments</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>I asked if the CCTV could be configured to trigger on bicycles
on Lake and Del Mar.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Staff updates</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>710</li>
<li>bylaws</li>
<li>MTA Gold line issues brought the engineers from kentucky
improved, by 20-30 sec.
preemption signals have extend a marengo.
MTA received kove report but hasn't really responded.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Old Business</p>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">Ambassador West</p>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">Public Speak</p>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">RJ, CEQA issues?</p>
<p>Points out that the harvest rock parking issues aren't really
CEQA issues, they're a different type of problem. Argues
not significant.</p>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">responds to harvest rock</p>
<p>2,3,5,6,7
Argues that there are a number of parking lots nearby</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Fred Zapeta, West Pasadeana Resident</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>does support the project, has some minor issues.</li>
<li>wants to minimize impact on orange grove,
wants to put in Ts to prevent left turns on orange grove.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Serin ???, Kimbly Horn</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Responsible for text portion of the mobility plan.
Parking, confusion as term &quot;Public Parking&quot; but
intended to be shared parking pg 18, 19</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">David Pool, Meranatha High school, President BoD</p>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">BoD supports the project.</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Nature of joint use agreement.</p>
<p>harvest rock, eclusive use of 293 parking, on saturdays &amp; sunday
doesn't have contratiual to 53 slots, but plan on continuing.
can coordinate to share parking for use on other times</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">Doug Hues, Dir Oper, from HR</p>
<p>The list they provided was &quot;history&quot; for WCG, they
concerned about maintaining access for concert events</p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Steve Ross, Dir Planning ? Homes<ul>
<li>mentions what pasadenas zoning code,
1262 seats, need 1 car per 5 seats? 252 spaces</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Greg ? Applicant<ul>
<li>Pg 4 of harvest letter, paragraph A, 2nd paragraph
want to have rights &quot;running with the land&quot; not owner.
they didn't, but they didn't negotiate for those rights.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Commissioners, questions</p>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">the applicant thought WPRA's suggestion for a t-bone curb was a good idea</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Chair, says there may be too much parking for the sunrise use.
parking for sunrise will be determined by the CUP process</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Route for certification for this proejct,Daryl ? from Planning
Commisison</p>
<p>Parts will go through planning, but the fina EIR goes to councila</p>
<p>Chair, recommends that their be more consistancy in how EIRs are
reviewed.</p>
<p>person from city legal, describes that the process is more
orderly than it appears. requires certification before discretionary
action</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Send comments to Chair and Vice Chair
Juan Velasquez, Vince Farhat
who will summarize</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Close of public comments
* oral, Oct 11, written, Oct 30</li>
<li>Pedestrain Saftey vide<ul>
<li>given out 500 bike helmets</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Pedestrian Committee, Comissioner Delgado<ul>
<li>Showed a group of students for a community planning class,
cal poly, pomona
always use a real client, students develop scope of services</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <title>TAC Meeting 2006, Sept 9</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac-2006-09-07-18-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><p class="first">Call to order</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Roll Call</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Vince Farhat</li>
<li>Diane Trout</li>
<li>Jennifer Higginbotham</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Public comment</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Commissioner Comments</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Asks about distribution of and update of bike master plan</li>
<li>chair, discussed westage sept 18th, before council</li>
<li>for ambassodor west, try to have comments ready (in writing)
for next meeting.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Approval of minutes</p>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Staff activities</p>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Eric Chen, $450,000 for construction of bicycle boulevard project<ul>
<li>finishing paperwork</li>
<li>north marengo between orange grove and washington</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Old business</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>trip rededuction (transportation management plan)
recommend 75,000 sqft.</li>
<li>Gold line queuing<ul>
<li>short term</li>
<li>korve was initial engineering review firm for the gold line</li>
<li>peer review, doesn't have detailed knowledge of system</li>
<li>&quot;abnormal number of atypical events&quot;</li>
<li>reverse coordination, free the front of a queue, instead
of typical moving wave of green</li>
<li>sometimes hold the train to let the traffic clear,
especially when at stations.</li>
<li>the flashing yellow, is to avoid the &quot;yellow&quot; trap,
supposidly not to confuse drivers</li>
<li>longerterm<ul>
<li>try to make meets very clean at california</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>there's a required study for the flashing yellow</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Caltech Master Plan</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">Ambassador West</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>oct 11 public meeting</li>
<li>harvest rock church, pastor<ul>
<li>started recently</li>
<li>parking serious problem</li>
<li>conference world wide</li>
<li>are responsible for running ambassador auditorium<ul>
<li>want to state mission...</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>wants public parking in the area.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>doug huse, manager<ul>
<li>about 600 cars</li>
<li>10 parking &quot;clusters&quot;</li>
<li>multiple owners of the facility<ul>
<li>only 3 clusters on the campus still available.</li>
<li>EIR, removing 140 parking spaces...</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>2008 40 events?</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Charles Kenny,<ul>
<li>wants to know what the 30 spaces are for?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>clarification<ul>
<li>one report by applicant, one by consultant.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Does SEQUA require that negative parking impacts be addressed?<ul>
<li>unclear, very techincal law question</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><p class="first">send comments to bauman</p>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <title>Special TAC meeting</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac/2006-04-27-16-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>covering the 3 things that changed since their last meeting</li>
</ul>
<p>Whats &quot;sequa&quot;</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>there's already some conditioning of a project build, how does this
fee extend things.<ul>
<li>How are the funds going to be spent?</li>
<li>Does it help with streamling other aspects of the project</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The fee goes away when the projects finish</li>
<li>The fee is attached to building those $54e6 of projects.</li>
<li>they want some more detail about how it'll help, save some of the discussion.</li>
<li>doesn't it set a bound on how far the the developers study has to extend.</li>
<li>they want a industry specific FAQ</li>
<li>is there a way of more specifically planning out what improvents are needed
so the developers can have less uncertainty about a council or developer
suddenly want something new.</li>
<li>Arts busses need to be frequent reliable convient</li>
<li>Would it be possible to opt in?</li>
<li>May 5th tac meeting 7.30 am</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <title>TAC Meeting</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac/2006-02-09-20-00.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>adjustments to to the agenda<ul>
<li>note that they only did the automobile counts?</li>
<li>the comment about &quot;report card&quot; measurements</li>
<li>fuller EIR,</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Los Angeles Times<ul>
<li>changes in suburban development, complimentary to pasadena</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Floraline Stevenes, PhD, Educator, new comissioner</li>
<li>Roger suggests that the commussion form a working group, on bike parking.
Gray, DelGado, Valesques<ul>
<li>Zoning code is online</li>
<li>Urban land institute, shared parking analysis, residental parking
for apartments &amp; condos, 1.5, 1.7 dwelling units</li>
<li>Survey of 4000 urban california parking 1.59 parking spaces per unit.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Trip reduction ordance<ul>
<li>is there data available of how many properties meet these various
thresholds</li>
<li>They need to determine the remaining fee structure</li>
<li>talk to city attorney</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Westgate Draft EIR<ul>
<li>Apeals, 10 days after action item</li>
<li>Last day pubic coment feb 21st</li>
<li>Public comments<ul>
<li>West pasadena resident association</li>
<li>has many issues with EIR</li>
<li>substitution of max for minimum for</li>
<li>changed intersection policy from D to E
(long lines, waiting through several cycles)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>there's a computer model of the traffic plan
Wonder if one can get it?</li>
<li>Comissioner comments<ul>
<li>Roger points out the lack of pedestrian data</li>
<li>comissioner delgado , why aren't there more counts<ul>
<li>2015, allows minimum requirement traffic E</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>next comissioner<ul>
<li>why isn't there more commercial</li>
<li>10' setback from street isn't walkable</li>
<li>several intersections drop to E or worse,
is that to encourage mass transit by preventing anything else
from working</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Planning commission<ul>
<li>Feb 22</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

<item>
  <title>TAC Meeting</title>
  <link>http://woldlab.caltech.edu/~diane/index.cgi/government/tac/2006-01-13-08-30.html</link>
  <description><![CDATA[

<div class="document">
<ul class="simple">
<li>Call meeting to order</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ul class="simple">
<li>Public Comment<ul>
<li>Previous secretary said thanks</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Agenda Updates</li>
<li>Commissioner Comments<ul>
<li>Sir Peter Hall, Address, nifty ideas about transit</li>
<li>There was an interruption on the gold line, MTA responded,
There was questions about what the MTA did for the rose parade<ul>
<li>MTA managers at stations to respond the accident, quickly set
up bus bridge</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>They're going to be quite busy for the next 6 months, number of
big projects.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Westgate , Robert ?, vincent gonzeles, Draft EIR<ul>
<li>Green/Delacy/Del Mar/Pasadena, 11.94 acres</li>
<li>820 residental units</li>
<li>comment period ends feburary</li>
<li>Impacts (Minor)<ul>
<li>there are underground storage tanks which need to be evaluated
for being closed and for whats in them</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Imapacts (Significant)<ul>
<li>Air Quality, construction, operation,</li>
<li>Public Services, multiple projects are going to put a drain on police
&amp; fire</li>
<li>Traffic, construction of this project, and others in the same area
increased vehicle trips</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Traffic (Traditional)<ul>
<li>evaluated to 2015 using models from the general plan</li>
<li>Yay metioned bike parking (according to bike plan)</li>
<li>trip reduction plan according to city trip reduction ordanence</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Comissionars comments, review EIR, bring comments in writing<ul>
<li>is the staff going to bring the report back to TAC</li>
<li>roger wants to see the Pedestrian and bike data
because its in transit zone? They don't have it.</li>
<li>Carolyn Naber, Annual report card, evaluate how well mitigation
measures work<ul>
<li>record scoping standards</li>
<li>project travel times needs to be done, but doesn't necessarily
need to be in the EIR</li>
<li>discussion</li>
<li>why the consultant didn't come up with clever things for net
zero traffic increase<ul>
<li>Arts system contributions?</li>
<li>Page 60 of traffic study</li>
<li>project is going to contribute to nexus project 50-60%
to transit</li>
<li>Lake zone has plans to offer residents passes for 1st year</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Fuller EIR<ul>
<li>60 day review Feb 21st</li>
<li>corsen to union/ madison el molino</li>
<li>857 Units add to campus walnut /corsen</li>
<li>more academic space</li>
<li>500 space parking strucure walnet/madison</li>
<li>mitigation<ul>
<li>traffic camera</li>
<li>extend traffic links</li>
<li>expand fullers road share program</li>
<li>some bike parking spaces, improved bicycle racks</li>
<li>installation of a 1 countdown traffic signal</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>comments,<ul>
<li>perhaps flex car system for students<ul>
<li>variance because of a city traffic ordances</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>commisionar impressed with<ul>
<li>pedestrian corridor</li>
<li>1.5 persons per car trip (aparantly very high)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>My general Questions?<ul>
<li>anyone done trip surveys of various pasadena resients?
personal trip logs?</li>
<li>what about trying to get in the pay as you go car insurance programs</li>
<li>Whats ITS program</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</div>

]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
